It s getting fierce! It s revealed that the Warriors are considering quoting for James again! Zhanku is expected to join forces to win the championship

There are talented people in the country who have emerged in the past, and they have been leading the way for hundreds of years.

For LeBron James, who is over 40 years old, his life as the boss of the Lakers is over this summer! Even though James chose to return to the Lakers this summer to implement his $52.6 million player option next season, he could clearly feel that this Lakers no longer belongs to him, because the Lakers' current team building policy is to revolve around Luka Doncic. This can be seen from the fact that the Lakers only brought in DeAndre Ayton and Laravia in the free market this summer that they focused on the future rather than the present. And this happens to be contrary to James' desire to compete for the championship to ensure that he has meaningful career plans for every remaining season. In short, James and the Lakers are no longer the same person!

Recently, ESPN famous reporters Ramona Shelburne and Brian Windhorst jointly wrote an article about the situation of the Los Angeles Lakers. On the fourth day after the Lakers were eliminated in the first round in May this year, Pelinka, Redick and Doncic met to explain the Lakers' team building plan. It is particularly worth mentioning that James, the core figure of every decision and strategy of the Lakers in the past seven years, was not invited to attend this meeting, which seems to be more certain that James is no longer planning for the Lakers in the future. There is no doubt that this will inevitably make James feel that he has not received enough respect from the Lakers.

Little do you know that there are more heartbreaking things to come! The Lakers have reportedly stated that they will not offer James a contract after the 2025-26 season, which means that the era of James as the Lakers' face will usher in a scheduled end date for the first time. In other words, James' Lakers career has entered the countdown! He may leave at some point next time, and at the latest it will be the expiration of his contract next summer.

After all, when the Lakers made it clear that they would not offer James a new contract, his Lakers' career limit was only the season left. You should know that this is the first time in James' 23-year NBA career that the team has not been retained by the team, which makes people vaguely feel that the Lakers may really part ways with James at some point in the next time.

According to ESPN Lakers reporter Dave McMenamin, Ricci Paul revealed that four teams in the league have contacted him and they want to discuss the LeBron James deal with him. So, what will these four teams that want to trade James? Little do they know that there are Golden State Warriors who considered trading for James in the 2023-24 season.

According to ESPN famous reporter Ramona Shelburne, league sources revealed that several teams, including the Golden State Warriors, have once again considered whether to make an offer to the Lakers for the LeBron James deal.

There is no doubt that among the teams that are considering quoting for James, the Warriors are undoubtedly the one that is most exciting and expected, because this means that James and Curry have a chance to join forces to compete for the championship! Although Curry and James had fought on the finals stage a few years ago, they are now eager to play together in the late stage of each other's career.

Especially the successful cooperation between Zhanku in the Paris Olympics last year, which further stimulated their desire to join forces! Although it will be very difficult to take James away from Los Angeles, and the trading chips that the Warriors can provide may not necessarily impress the Lakers management, this at least gives people the hope of Zhanku joining forces to win the championship!

Just imagine, if James had the opportunity to join forces with his good brother Curry to win the championship this summer, he would definitely be happy to give up the trade veto. What do you think about this?