AI referee who makes great mistakes in Wimbledon

The situation occurred in game 9 set 1 round four women's singles on July 6, when Pavlyuchenkova held the serve at 4-4. This is a tense game when the veteran Russian tennis player faces four break-point and saves three of them. Everything can turn otherwise if the referee does not miss the error of Kartal. Nico Helworth referee seems to see the ball out, but still waiting for the signal from the referee.

After about 4 minutes of delay, Helworth cannot review the ball with slow technology. He claimed that the two players needed to play this point again, making Pavlyuchenkova urgent. The 34 -year -old player accused the referee the opponent of the homeowner. She lost this game and was led 4-5, but then took advantage of the break-point in the next ball game, before defeating the opponent 7-3 in the tie-break series. Set two happier, when former Roland Garros runner-up took advantage of two break-point to win 6-4. Pavlyuchenkova in the quarterfinals and will meet Amanda Anisimova tomorrow 8/7.

"We need to follow the system ," the referee Helworth explained. "If they say the system does not work, we cannot do anything else. The referee's decision will rely on technology, and sometimes this system has problems that the referee cannot make their own statements. Observing the field with the referee is too much, especially with the pitch as fast as Wimbledon. Previously, the referee had at least 4 supporting referees.

Before Pavlyuchenkova, Emma Raducanu also complained about AI referee in the defeat of Aryna Sabalenka in the third round. After losing a controversy, his player told the referee: "He saw the ball, right? It was disappointing when this tournament had such a wrong decision".

Raducanu said she did not believe in the referee, similar to compatriot Jack Draper. The number of four -male seeds said that he suffered some wrong decisions from the referee, when losing to Marin Cilic in the second round. "Honestly, I don't think this technology is 100