Former referee: Kubasi seems to be clearing but does not clearing, but trips Lautaro, this is a penalty kick

May 7th news Early this morning, Inter Milan defeated Barcelona 4-3 at home in the second leg of the Champions League semi-finals, eliminating his opponent 7-6 to advance to the final. Former referee Iturard talked about several controversial penalty cases that the referee Maziniak had in the game. In the third minute, Dimarco's foul on Yamal

This action triggered strong protests from the Barcelona bench. However, referee Mazinac firmly stopped their protest and did not show a yellow card. Iturard believed: "This is just an ordinary foul." Two minutes later, Eric Garcia's pull on Dimarco

This made Inter Milan's bench demand a yellow card, but the referee still did not make a penalty. Iturard explained: "The referee tried to control the game without using a yellow card." Inter Milan's goal

Inter Milan successfully intercepted in the opponent's halftime, Dumfries broke through Barcelona's defense and assisted Lautaro to score the first goal. Barcelona players claimed that Olmo had been fouled before, but Iturald made it clear: "This is not a foul on Olmo."

Archerbi's handball controversy

In a wonderful cooperation with Barcelona, ​​Pedri entered the penalty area in the 25th minute to try a pass, but was intercepted by a defensive player. Pedri asked for a handball penalty, but after confirmation by the VAR referee, the referee said there was no problem. Iturard added: "The ball came from the player's own foot and hit between his chest and shoulders, without any problem."

Calhanoglu's yellow card

In a Barcelona attack, Calhanoglu fouled against Ormo, but the game continued, and the referee then presented the first yellow card of the game. Iturard explained: "The foul was serious and he allowed the game to continue and warned him later." As the first half was approaching the end of Lautaro's penalty, Lautaro broke into the penalty area and Kubasi tripped him. After many replays, Iturard clearly explained: "This is a very difficult penalty to see on the court. From the direction of the ball, it seems that Ku Brazil is clearing, but in fact Lautaro put his foot between the ball and Ku Brazil. Ku Brazil did not clear, but tripped Lautaro. This was a penalty. I don't understand why Ku Brazil was not sent off."

Yamar's suspected penalty

Yamar fell after entering the penalty area. Although he asked for a penalty, Iturard believed: "This is not a penalty, it is just a part of the game."

Achelbi's goal was cancelled

Two minutes later, Inter Milan passed Archerbi's head The ball scored, but was judged invalid for offside. Iturard commented: "This offside is very obvious. He was in the offside position from the beginning."

Yamar's suspected penalty again

Yamar used a steal opportunity to rush into the penalty area, blocked and had contact in the penalty area, but Iturard saw it very clearly: "He was tripped outside the penalty area, and tripping and pulling are different."

"The pulling occurs at the end of the action, while the tripping occurs at the first contact. In addition, for this objective situation, the referee does not need to look at the monitor. Even if there is subsequent contact in the penalty area, the foul starts outside the penalty area."